linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: SoC name and revision unification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1360842924-32429-3-git-send-email-ruslan.bilovol@ti.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:55:23 +0200
From:	Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...com>
To:	tony@...mide.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: SoC name and revision unification

This is a long story where for each new generation of
OMAP we used different approaches for creating
strings for SoCs names and revisions that this patch
fixes. It makes future exporting of this information
to SoC infrastructure easier.

Signed-off-by: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
index 8a68f1e..3737700 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
@@ -31,8 +31,11 @@
 #define OMAP4_SILICON_TYPE_STANDARD		0x01
 #define OMAP4_SILICON_TYPE_PERFORMANCE		0x02
 
+#define OMAP_SOC_MAX_NAME_LENGTH		16
+
 static unsigned int omap_revision;
-static const char *cpu_rev;
+static char soc_name[OMAP_SOC_MAX_NAME_LENGTH];
+static char soc_rev[OMAP_SOC_MAX_NAME_LENGTH];
 u32 omap_features;
 
 unsigned int omap_rev(void)
@@ -169,9 +172,12 @@ void __init omap2xxx_check_revision(void)
 		j = i;
 	}
 
-	pr_info("OMAP%04x", omap_rev() >> 16);
+	sprintf(soc_name, "OMAP%04x", omap_rev() >> 16);
+	sprintf(soc_rev, "ES%x", (omap_rev() >> 12) & 0xf);
+
+	pr_info("%s", soc_name);
 	if ((omap_rev() >> 8) & 0x0f)
-		pr_info("ES%x", (omap_rev() >> 12) & 0xf);
+		pr_info("%s", soc_rev);
 	pr_info("\n");
 }
 
@@ -211,8 +217,10 @@ static void __init omap3_cpuinfo(void)
 		cpu_name = "OMAP3503";
 	}
 
+	sprintf(soc_name, "%s", cpu_name);
+
 	/* Print verbose information */
-	pr_info("%s ES%s (", cpu_name, cpu_rev);
+	pr_info("%s %s (", soc_name, soc_rev);
 
 	OMAP3_SHOW_FEATURE(l2cache);
 	OMAP3_SHOW_FEATURE(iva);
@@ -291,6 +299,7 @@ void __init ti81xx_check_features(void)
 
 void __init omap3xxx_check_revision(void)
 {
+	const char *cpu_rev;
 	u32 cpuid, idcode;
 	u16 hawkeye;
 	u8 rev;
@@ -438,6 +447,7 @@ void __init omap3xxx_check_revision(void)
 		cpu_rev = "1.2";
 		pr_warn("Warning: unknown chip type; assuming OMAP3630ES1.2\n");
 	}
+	sprintf(soc_rev, "ES%s", cpu_rev);
 }
 
 void __init omap4xxx_check_revision(void)
@@ -512,8 +522,10 @@ void __init omap4xxx_check_revision(void)
 		omap_revision = OMAP4430_REV_ES2_3;
 	}
 
-	pr_info("OMAP%04x ES%d.%d\n", omap_rev() >> 16,
-		((omap_rev() >> 12) & 0xf), ((omap_rev() >> 8) & 0xf));
+	sprintf(soc_name, "OMAP%04x", omap_rev() >> 16);
+	sprintf(soc_rev, "ES%d.%d", (omap_rev() >> 12) & 0xf,
+						(omap_rev() >> 8) & 0xf);
+	pr_info("%s %s\n", soc_name, soc_rev);
 }
 
 void __init omap5xxx_check_revision(void)
@@ -547,8 +559,10 @@ void __init omap5xxx_check_revision(void)
 		omap_revision = OMAP5430_REV_ES1_0;
 	}
 
-	pr_info("OMAP%04x ES%d.0\n",
-			omap_rev() >> 16, ((omap_rev() >> 12) & 0xf));
+	sprintf(soc_name, "OMAP%04x", omap_rev() >> 16);
+	sprintf(soc_rev, "ES%d.0", (omap_rev() >> 12) & 0xf);
+
+	pr_info("%s %s\n", soc_name, soc_rev);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/