[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <511CD3D6.7080102@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:08:54 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
anton@...ba.org, hpa@...or.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] rwsem: Implement writer lock-stealing
On 02/14/2013 09:31 AM, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> Alex, could you go through my patch and see if there is anything you
> find objectionable ? (if not about the details, at least about the
> general approach of enabling writer lock stealing on the fast path)
I am still in my lunar new year vacation. I may do a aim7 test for you
after back to office.
But as to fast path stealing, I didn't see extra benefit on fast path.
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists