linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI / ACPI: Report _OSC control mask returned on failure to get control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130214134735.GA22258@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
Date:	Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:47:35 +0100
From:	Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / ACPI: Report _OSC control mask returned on failure
 to get control

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 01:07:02PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Unfortunately, it doesn't, because I've lost track of the whole thread in the
> meantime.  Care to give a pointer?

In other words, you'd like to tell me rather straight that I should
stop doing such nonsense as replying to a very old patch posting with
some (questionably?) useful info related to that case?
And I here I was thinking that linking things together according to
their relations/relevancy would be a good thing :)

Your oldish patch can be seen at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/29/406

(or perhaps I should at least specify the URL reference when replying
to older activity)

Sorry & Thanks,

Andreas Mohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/