[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <511CF3C0.5010409@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:25:04 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
CC: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, arm@...nel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: exynos: move exynos4210-combiner to drivers/irqchip
On 02/13/2013 12:51 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Rob / Olof,
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 04:04:52PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>>
>>> Exynos boot is broken with commit 0529e315 (ARM: use common irqchip_init
>>> for GIC init). This commit split the irqchip initialization into 2 calls
>>> to of_irq_init. This does not work because of_irq_init requires interrupt
>>> parents to be in the match list.
>>>
>>> Rather than reverting exynos changes, make it do the proper thing by using
>>> IRQCHIP_DECLARE. This requires moving the combiner code to drivers/irqchip.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
>>> Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>>> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I thought there may be other platforms broken in the same way, but I
>>> checked and exynos is the only one.
>>>
>>> This is based on my gic/vic irqchip branch in arm-soc.
>>
>> Applied to next/cleanup.
>
> I synced up to next-20130213 and the problem is fixed. :) ...that
> label doesn't exactly boot but the problems are unrelated to this
> problem now (there are problems with the OF conversions to raw
> spinlocks)...
>
That should be fixed, but may not be in -next yet. It is in Grant's tree.
Rob
> I haven't done any review of this code (I'm assuming that Olof already
> looked it over and Samsung engineers will give it a thorough review),
> but it's definitely tested. :)
>
> Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Doug
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists