[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360869932.23152.51.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:25:32 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]sched/stop_task: Do not account zero delta_exec in
put_prev_task_stop
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:15 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> ---
> > kernel/sched/stop_task.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
> > index da5eb5b..78d0458 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
> > @@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ static void put_prev_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> > u64 delta_exec;
> >
> > delta_exec = rq->clock_task - curr->se.exec_start;
> > - if (unlikely((s64)delta_exec < 0))
> > - delta_exec = 0;
> > + if (unlikely((s64)delta_exec <= 0))
> > + return;
>
> It seems it needs to update curr->se.exec_start then.
>
Ah, if it's less than zero, it does.
A better patch would be:
if (unlikely((s64)delta_exec <= 0)) {
curr->se.exec_start = rq->clock_task;
return;
}
Thanks!
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists