linux-kernel - Re: [v2 1/4] ARM: tegra20: create a DT header defining CLK IDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:29:06 -0700
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
CC:	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"sjg@...omium.org" <sjg@...omium.org>,
	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 1/4] ARM: tegra20: create a DT header defining CLK IDs

On 02/14/2013 01:34 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote @ Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:15:28 +0100:
> 
>> Oh, and I don't think you updated e.g. nvidia,tegra20-car.txt to remove
>> the list of clocks.
> 
> Not yet removed. I think that this could be done with the patch which
> allows kernel source to include DT header files.

By defining the header file, you're really causing that header to be
part of the binding definition. I think we should move the code from the
binding .txt file to the header, rather than duplicating it and then
removing it. The kernel doesn't include the binding .txt file right now,
so I don't see any correlation with making it include the header vs.
when we remove the list from the binding document.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/