[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130214032633.GF9057@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:26:33 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2 wq/for-3.9] workqueue: fix is_chained_work() regression
c9e7cf273f ("workqueue: move busy_hash from global_cwq to
worker_pool") incorrectly converted is_chained_work() to use
get_gcwq() inside for_each_gcwq_cpu() while removing get_gcwq().
As cwq might not exist for all possible workqueue CPUs, @cwq can be
NULL and the following cwq deferences can lead to oops.
Fix it by using for_each_cwq_cpu() instead, which is the better one to
use anyway as we only need to check pools that the wq is associated
with.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ static bool is_chained_work(struct workq
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int cpu;
- for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) {
+ for_each_cwq_cpu(cpu, wq) {
struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(cpu, wq);
struct worker_pool *pool = cwq->pool;
struct worker *worker;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists