lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1360820921-2513-9-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:48:41 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] sched: reset lb_env when redo in load_balance()

Commit 88b8dac0 makes load_balance() consider other cpus in its group.
So, now, When we redo in load_balance(), we should reset some fields of
lb_env to ensure that load_balance() works for initial cpu, not for other
cpus in its group. So correct it.

Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 70631e8..25c798c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5014,14 +5014,20 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
 
 	struct lb_env env = {
 		.sd		= sd,
-		.dst_cpu	= this_cpu,
-		.dst_rq		= this_rq,
 		.dst_grpmask    = dst_grp,
 		.idle		= idle,
-		.loop_break	= sched_nr_migrate_break,
 		.cpus		= cpus,
 	};
 
+	schedstat_inc(sd, lb_count[idle]);
+	cpumask_copy(cpus, cpu_active_mask);
+
+redo:
+	env.dst_cpu = this_cpu;
+	env.dst_rq = this_rq;
+	env.loop = 0;
+	env.loop_break = sched_nr_migrate_break;
+
 	/* For NEWLY_IDLE load_balancing, we don't need to consider
 	 * other cpus in our group */
 	if (idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) {
@@ -5030,11 +5036,7 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
 		cpumask_copy(dst_grp, sched_group_cpus(sd->groups));
 		cpumask_clear_cpu(env.dst_cpu, env.dst_grpmask);
 	}
-	cpumask_copy(cpus, cpu_active_mask);
 
-	schedstat_inc(sd, lb_count[idle]);
-
-redo:
 	group = find_busiest_group(&env, balance);
 
 	if (*balance == 0)
@@ -5133,11 +5135,9 @@ more_balance:
 		/* All tasks on this runqueue were pinned by CPU affinity */
 		if (unlikely(env.flags & LBF_ALL_PINNED)) {
 			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu_of(busiest), cpus);
-			if (!cpumask_empty(cpus)) {
-				env.loop = 0;
-				env.loop_break = sched_nr_migrate_break;
+			if (!cpumask_empty(cpus))
 				goto redo;
-			}
+
 			goto out_balanced;
 		}
 	}
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ