linux-kernel - Re: SELinux + ubifs: possible circular locking dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1360823765.12703.153.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:36:05 +0200
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: SELinux + ubifs: possible circular locking dependency

On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:37 +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > +	lockdep_set_class(&isec->lock, inode->i_sb->s_type->i_mutex_key);
> 
> So I added an "&", so that the line looks like that:

Yeah, I did not compile it, and for the deadlock of course I have to add
own class for isec->lock in the fstype structure. I'll try to come up
with another patch. Thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/