linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH EDAC 07/13] edac: add support for raw error reports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:41:23 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH EDAC 07/13] edac: add support for raw error reports

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:25:30PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Well, for sure using an structure will help to avoid missing a
> parameter or exchanging its order. The stack usage won't reduce,
> though, because the structure will keep using the stack.

If you allocate it on the stack of the caller, yes. If you kmalloc it,
no.

In any case, passing a pointer to struct edac_raw_error_desc only will
allow on x86_64 (and i386 AFAICT) to use only registers to pass callee
function arguments. Which is always a win. You probably need to stare at
compiler output to see what gcc actually does with -O2 optimizations.

> As I can't foresee the usage of this function call outside the core
> and by the GHES driver, I'm not sure what would be the better.

Having an error descriptor is always better, even if it were only for
clarity's and simplicity's sake.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/