| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:12:49 -0800 From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com> To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, dirk.brandewie@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq/intel_pstate: Add kernel command line option disable intel_pstate. On 02/15/2013 05:28 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 15 February 2013 18:00, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote: >> On Friday, February 15, 2013 09:53:24 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> Parameter to this is really not required. By default intel_pstate >>> driver is enabled, so just past disable_intel_pstate from command line >>> without any args. >> >> Well, quite frankly, I'm fine with both. It all boils down to passing a >> specific string on the kernel command line. > > Well, we are all looking to save worlds power here and my suggestion > would definitely use less power as it has less instructions to execute. > Just for fun!!. > I would like to leave it the way it is now. If for what ever reason we need another switch passed to the driver we have a place for it without adding another single purpose command line option The updated with __initdata and the spelling fixes will follow shortly --Dirk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists