[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <511E5E81.5050408@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:12:49 -0800
From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, dirk.brandewie@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq/intel_pstate: Add kernel command line option
disable intel_pstate.
On 02/15/2013 05:28 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 15 February 2013 18:00, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>> On Friday, February 15, 2013 09:53:24 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> Parameter to this is really not required. By default intel_pstate
>>> driver is enabled, so just past disable_intel_pstate from command line
>>> without any args.
>>
>> Well, quite frankly, I'm fine with both. It all boils down to passing a
>> specific string on the kernel command line.
>
> Well, we are all looking to save worlds power here and my suggestion
> would definitely use less power as it has less instructions to execute.
> Just for fun!!.
>
I would like to leave it the way it is now. If for what ever reason we need
another switch passed to the driver we have a place for it without adding
another single purpose command line option
The updated with __initdata and the spelling fixes will follow shortly
--Dirk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists