[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130215035400.GD25015@drongo>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:54:00 +1100
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: aik@...abs.ru
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] vfio powerpc: added real mode support
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:12:43PM +1100, aik@...abs.ru wrote:
> From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
>
> The patch allows the host kernel to handle H_PUT_TCE request
> without involving QEMU in it what should save time on switching
> from the kernel to QEMU and back.
>
> The patch adds an IOMMU ID parameter into the KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE ioctl,
> QEMU needs to be fixed to support that.
>
> At the moment H_PUT_TCE is processed in the virtual mode as the page
> to be mapped may not be present in the RAM so paging may be involved as
> it can be done from the virtual mode only.
>
> Tests show that this patch increases tranmission speed from 220MB/s
> to 750..1020MB/s on 10Gb network (Chelsea CXGB3 10Gb ethernet card).
[snip]
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
> index b4fdabc..acb9cdc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@
> #include <asm/fadump.h>
> #include <asm/vio.h>
> #include <asm/tce.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_book3s_64.h>
> +#include <asm/page.h>
>
> #define DBG(...)
>
> @@ -727,6 +729,7 @@ void iommu_register_group(struct iommu_table * tbl,
> return;
> }
> tbl->it_group = grp;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tbl->it_hugepages);
> iommu_group_set_iommudata(grp, tbl, group_release);
> iommu_group_set_name(grp, kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "domain%d-pe%lx",
> domain_number, pe_num));
> @@ -906,6 +909,83 @@ void kvm_iommu_unmap_pages(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> {
> }
>
> +/*
> + * The KVM guest can be backed with 16MB pages (qemu switch
> + * -mem-path /var/lib/hugetlbfs/global/pagesize-16MB/).
> + * In this case, we cannot do page counting from the real mode
> + * as the compound pages are used - they are linked in a list
> + * with pointers as virtual addresses which are inaccessible
> + * in real mode.
> + *
> + * The code below keeps a 16MB pages list and uses page struct
> + * in real mode if it is already locked in RAM and inserted into
> + * the list or switches to the virtual mode where it can be
> + * handled in a usual manner.
> + */
> +struct iommu_kvmppc_hugepages {
> + struct list_head list;
> + pte_t pte; /* Huge page PTE */
> + unsigned long pa; /* Base phys address used as a real TCE */
> + struct page *page; /* page struct of the very first subpage */
> + unsigned long size; /* Huge page size (always 16MB at the moment) */
> + bool dirty; /* Dirty bit */
> +};
> +
> +static struct iommu_kvmppc_hugepages *find_hp_by_pte(struct iommu_table *tbl,
> + pte_t pte)
> +{
> + struct iommu_kvmppc_hugepages *hp;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(hp, &tbl->it_hugepages, list) {
> + if (hp->pte == pte)
> + return hp;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static struct iommu_kvmppc_hugepages *find_hp_by_pa(struct iommu_table *tbl,
> + unsigned long pa)
> +{
> + struct iommu_kvmppc_hugepages *hp;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(hp, &tbl->it_hugepages, list) {
> + if ((hp->pa <= pa) && (pa < hp->pa + hp->size))
> + return hp;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static struct iommu_kvmppc_hugepages *add_hp(struct iommu_table *tbl,
> + pte_t pte, unsigned long va, unsigned long pg_size)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct iommu_kvmppc_hugepages *hp;
> +
> + hp = kzalloc(sizeof(*hp), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!hp)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + hp->pte = pte;
> + va = va & ~(pg_size - 1);
> + ret = get_user_pages_fast(va, 1, true/*write*/, &hp->page);
> + if ((ret != 1) || !hp->page) {
> + kfree(hp);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +#if defined(HASHED_PAGE_VIRTUAL) || defined(WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL)
> +#error TODO: fix to avoid page_address() here
> +#endif
> + hp->pa = __pa((unsigned long) page_address(hp->page));
> +
> + hp->size = pg_size;
> +
> + list_add(&hp->list, &tbl->it_hugepages);
> +
> + return hp;
> +}
I don't see any locking here. What stops one cpu doing add_hp() from
racing with another doing find_hp_by_pte() or find_hp_by_pa()?
[snip]
> @@ -1021,6 +1123,24 @@ long iommu_clear_tce_user_mode(struct iommu_table *tbl, unsigned long ioba,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_clear_tce_user_mode);
>
> +long iommu_clear_tce_real_mode(struct iommu_table *tbl, unsigned long ioba,
> + unsigned long tce_value, unsigned long npages)
> +{
> + long ret;
> + unsigned long entry = ioba >> IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> + ret = tce_clear_param_check(tbl, ioba, tce_value, npages);
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = clear_tce(tbl, true, entry, npages);
> +
> + if (ret < 0)
> + pr_err("iommu_tce: %s failed ioba=%lx, tce_value=%lx ret=%ld\n",
> + __func__, ioba, tce_value, ret);
Better to avoid printk in real mode if at all possible, particularly
if they're guest-triggerable.
[snip]
> @@ -195,15 +225,43 @@ long kvmppc_h_put_tce_indirect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> if (!stt)
> return H_TOO_HARD;
>
> + if (stt->virtmode_only)
> + return H_TOO_HARD;
> +
> tces = (void *) get_real_address(vcpu, tce_list, false, NULL, NULL);
> if (!tces)
> return H_TOO_HARD;
>
> /* Emulated IO */
> - for (i = 0; (i < npages) && !ret; ++i, ioba += IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE)
> - ret = emulated_h_put_tce(stt, ioba, tces[i]);
> + if (!stt->tbl) {
> + for (i = 0; (i < npages) && !ret; ++i, ioba += IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE)
> + ret = emulated_h_put_tce(stt, ioba, tces[i]);
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* VFIO IOMMU */
> + for (i = 0; (i < npages) && !ret; ++i, ioba += IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE) {
> + unsigned long hpa, pg_size = 0;
> + pte_t pte = 0;
> +
> + hpa = get_real_address(vcpu, tces[i], tces[i] & TCE_PCI_WRITE,
> + &pte, &pg_size);
> + if (!hpa)
> + return H_TOO_HARD;
> +
> + ret = iommu_put_tce_real_mode(stt->tbl,
> + ioba, hpa, pte, pg_size);
If we get a failure part-way through, should we go back and remove the
entries we put in?
[snip]
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 26e2b271..3727ea6 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -863,6 +863,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping {
> #define KVM_ALLOCATE_RMA _IOR(KVMIO, 0xa9, struct kvm_allocate_rma)
> /* Available with KVM_CAP_PPC_HTAB_FD */
> #define KVM_PPC_GET_HTAB_FD _IOW(KVMIO, 0xaa, struct kvm_get_htab_fd)
> +#define KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU _IOW(KVMIO, 0xaf, struct kvm_create_spapr_tce_iommu)
This needs an entry in Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists