[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdC7JnoYwnKRsyr7v3or167OdX8mrv00VK-0YuPhpSFaw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:40:27 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...glemail.com>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
RavindranathX Doddi <ravindranathx.doddi@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Subject: Re: uhid: broken interface: 32/64-bit compatibility
> Any comments?
Generic comments. Could you use *_compat instead of *_old_*?
Another idea is do not touch current interface, just append new
function and associated structure to make a smooth transition of the
userspace stuff.
What about documentation (Documentation/hid/uhid.txt)? Could you
update it acordingly?
> Subject: [PATCH] uhid: introduce new create event to fix 32/64-bit
> compatibility issue
>
> Current create event has pointer in payload. It causes problem with
> 32/64-bit compatibility. In particular it's not possible to use 32-bit
> userspace driver with 64-bit kernel.
> This patch deprecates old create event and introduce a new one. The new
> create event has padding for pointer on 32-bit system to extend pointer
> correctly.
>
> Old userspace driver binaries will use old create event. It requires
> simple recompile to switch to new one.
That's what I afraid of. Better to try to avoid any excessive
requirement to the existing userspace.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists