| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1360959635-18922-2-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:20:25 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: dan.magenheimer@...cle.com, sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
ngupta@...are.org, rcj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
minchan@...nel.org
Cc: ric.masonn@...il.com, lliubbo@...il.com,
Stefan Hengelein <ilendir@...glemail.com>,
Florian Schmaus <fschmaus@...il.com>,
Andor Daam <andor.daam@...glemail.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] mm: frontswap: lazy initialization to allow tmem backends to build/run as modules
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
With the goal of allowing tmem backends (zcache, ramster, Xen tmem) to be
built/loaded as modules rather than built-in and enabled by a boot parameter,
this patch provides "lazy initialization", allowing backends to register to
frontswap even after swapon was run. Before a backend registers all calls
to init are recorded and the creation of tmem_pools delayed until a backend
registers or until a frontswap store is attempted.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hengelein <ilendir@...glemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Schmaus <fschmaus@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Andor Daam <andor.daam@...glemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
[v1: Fixes per Seth Jennings suggestions]
[v2: Removed FRONTSWAP_HAS_.. ]
[v3: Fix up per Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com> recommendations]
[v4: Fix up per Andrew's comments]
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
---
mm/frontswap.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/frontswap.c b/mm/frontswap.c
index 2890e67..c05a9db 100644
--- a/mm/frontswap.c
+++ b/mm/frontswap.c
@@ -80,6 +80,46 @@ static inline void inc_frontswap_succ_stores(void) { }
static inline void inc_frontswap_failed_stores(void) { }
static inline void inc_frontswap_invalidates(void) { }
#endif
+
+/*
+ * Due to the asynchronous nature of the backends loading potentially
+ * _after_ the swap system has been activated, we have chokepoints
+ * on all frontswap functions to not call the backend until the backend
+ * has registered.
+ *
+ * Specifically when no backend is registered (nobody called
+ * frontswap_register_ops) all calls to frontswap_init (which is done via
+ * swapon -> enable_swap_info -> frontswap_init) are registered and remembered
+ * (via the setting of need_init bitmap) but fail to create tmem_pools. When a
+ * backend registers with frontswap at some later point the previous
+ * calls to frontswap_init are executed (by iterating over the need_init
+ * bitmap) to create tmem_pools and set the respective poolids. All of that is
+ * guarded by us using atomic bit operations on the 'need_init' bitmap.
+ *
+ * This would not guards us against the user deciding to call swapoff right as
+ * we are calling the backend to initialize (so swapon is in action).
+ * Fortunatly for us, the swapon_mutex has been taked by the callee so we are
+ * OK. The other scenario where calls to frontswap_store (called via
+ * swap_writepage) is racing with frontswap_invalidate_area (called via
+ * swapoff) is again guarded by the swap subsystem.
+ *
+ * While no backend is registered all calls to frontswap_[store|load|
+ * invalidate_area|invalidate_page] are ignored or fail.
+ *
+ * The time between the backend being registered and the swap file system
+ * calling the backend (via the frontswap_* functions) is indeterminate as
+ * backend_registered is not atomic_t (or a value guarded by a spinlock).
+ * That is OK as we are comfortable missing some of these calls to the newly
+ * registered backend.
+ *
+ * Obviously the opposite (unloading the backend) must be done after all
+ * the frontswap_[store|load|invalidate_area|invalidate_page] start
+ * ignorning or failing the requests - at which point backend_registered
+ * would have to be made in some fashion atomic.
+ */
+static DECLARE_BITMAP(need_init, MAX_SWAPFILES);
+static bool backend_registered __read_mostly;
+
/*
* Register operations for frontswap, returning previous thus allowing
* detection of multiple backends and possible nesting.
@@ -87,9 +127,22 @@ static inline void inc_frontswap_invalidates(void) { }
struct frontswap_ops frontswap_register_ops(struct frontswap_ops *ops)
{
struct frontswap_ops old = frontswap_ops;
+ int i;
frontswap_ops = *ops;
frontswap_enabled = true;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_SWAPFILES; i++) {
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(i, need_init))
+ (*frontswap_ops.init)(i);
+ }
+ /*
+ * We MUST have backend_registered set _after_ the frontswap_init's
+ * have been called. Otherwise __frontswap_store might fail. Hence
+ * the barrier to make sure compiler does not re-order us.
+ */
+ barrier();
+ backend_registered = true;
return old;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(frontswap_register_ops);
@@ -119,10 +172,17 @@ void __frontswap_init(unsigned type)
{
struct swap_info_struct *sis = swap_info[type];
- BUG_ON(sis == NULL);
- if (sis->frontswap_map == NULL)
- return;
- frontswap_ops.init(type);
+ if (backend_registered) {
+ BUG_ON(sis == NULL);
+ if (sis->frontswap_map == NULL)
+ return;
+ (*frontswap_ops.init)(type);
+ }
+ else {
+ BUG_ON(type > MAX_SWAPFILES);
+ set_bit(type, need_init);
+ }
+
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__frontswap_init);
@@ -147,6 +207,11 @@ int __frontswap_store(struct page *page)
struct swap_info_struct *sis = swap_info[type];
pgoff_t offset = swp_offset(entry);
+ if (!backend_registered) {
+ inc_frontswap_failed_stores();
+ return ret;
+ }
+
BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
BUG_ON(sis == NULL);
if (frontswap_test(sis, offset))
@@ -186,6 +251,9 @@ int __frontswap_load(struct page *page)
struct swap_info_struct *sis = swap_info[type];
pgoff_t offset = swp_offset(entry);
+ if (!backend_registered)
+ return ret;
+
BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
BUG_ON(sis == NULL);
if (frontswap_test(sis, offset))
@@ -209,6 +277,9 @@ void __frontswap_invalidate_page(unsigned type, pgoff_t offset)
{
struct swap_info_struct *sis = swap_info[type];
+ if (!backend_registered)
+ return;
+
BUG_ON(sis == NULL);
if (frontswap_test(sis, offset)) {
frontswap_ops.invalidate_page(type, offset);
@@ -226,12 +297,15 @@ void __frontswap_invalidate_area(unsigned type)
{
struct swap_info_struct *sis = swap_info[type];
- BUG_ON(sis == NULL);
- if (sis->frontswap_map == NULL)
- return;
- frontswap_ops.invalidate_area(type);
- atomic_set(&sis->frontswap_pages, 0);
- memset(sis->frontswap_map, 0, sis->max / sizeof(long));
+ if (backend_registered) {
+ BUG_ON(sis == NULL);
+ if (sis->frontswap_map == NULL)
+ return;
+ (*frontswap_ops.invalidate_area)(type);
+ atomic_set(&sis->frontswap_pages, 0);
+ memset(sis->frontswap_map, 0, sis->max / sizeof(long));
+ }
+ clear_bit(type, need_init);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__frontswap_invalidate_area);
@@ -364,6 +438,7 @@ static int __init init_frontswap(void)
debugfs_create_u64("invalidates", S_IRUGO,
root, &frontswap_invalidates);
#endif
+ frontswap_enabled = 1;
return 0;
}
--
1.8.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists