[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <511F5F04.9000009@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 18:27:16 +0800
From: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH] kernel/res_counter.c: remove useless return
statement at res_counter_member()
Hi Andrew and David,
On 02/15/2013 07:21 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 13:04:52 +0800
> Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>> The return statement after BUG() is invalid, move BUG() to the default choice of the switch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/res_counter.c | 5 ++---
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/res_counter.c b/kernel/res_counter.c
>> index ff55247..748a3bc 100644
>> --- a/kernel/res_counter.c
>> +++ b/kernel/res_counter.c
>> @@ -135,10 +135,9 @@ res_counter_member(struct res_counter *counter, int member)
>> return &counter->failcnt;
>> case RES_SOFT_LIMIT:
>> return &counter->soft_limit;
>> + default:
>> + BUG();
>> };
>> -
>> - BUG();
>> - return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> ssize_t res_counter_read(struct res_counter *counter, int member,
>
> I expect it was done that way to avoid a hey-theres-no-return-statement
> warning when CONFIG_BUG=n.
>
Sorry for my late response, I just got back from vacation. So it's better to
keep it as it is.
Thanks,
-Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists