linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] dmaengine: dw_dmac: move to generic DMA binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VfL0cQJenHB7A_A1d2eam2dj3k+4yWRE8pC+_gP2j_k2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:53:08 +0200
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dmaengine: dw_dmac: move to generic DMA binding

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Saturday 16 February 2013, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:

>> > +       if (WARN_ON(fargs.req >= 16 || fargs.src >= 2 || fargs.dst >= 2))
>> > +               return NULL;
>>
>> 16 here is a magic number for me. I would like to see something like
>> #define DW_MAX_REQUEST_LINES 16 in the dw_dmac_regs.h.
>
> Ok.
>
>> Besides of that, what 2 does come from?
>
> I thought that Viresh had commented that there could only be two masters.
> It's probably best to compare against dw->nr_masters here.

Right.

>> > @@ -1765,6 +1751,10 @@ static int dw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> >
>> >         dma_async_device_register(&dw->dma);
>> >
>> > +       err = of_dma_controller_register(pdev->dev.of_node, dw_dma_xlate, dw);
>> > +       if (err)
>> > +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not register of_dma_controller\n");
>>
>> It's not an error, dev_dbg. Consider case when !CONFIG_OF.
>
> Ah right. I expected of_dma_controller_register to return 0 in that case, but
> it returns -ENODEV. How about I change this to this?
>
>         if (pdev->dev.of_node)
>                 err = of_dma_controller_register(pdev->dev.of_node, dw_dma_xlate, dw);
>         if (err && err != -ENODEV)
>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not register of_dma_controller\n");
>
> That would warn only when we have a dw_dmac device that was registered from
> device tree but does not follow the binding or gets an -ENOMEM.

I'm okay with it.

> Thanks for your review!

Thanks for the patch!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/