linux-kernel - Re: [patch v4 01/18] sched: set SD_PREFER_SIBLING on MC domain to reduce a domain level

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <511F1637.5000308@intel.com>
Date:	Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:16:39 +0800
From:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, pjt@...gle.com,
	namhyung@...nel.org, efault@....de, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v4 01/18] sched: set SD_PREFER_SIBLING on MC domain to
 reduce a domain level

On 02/15/2013 08:38 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 21:22 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> No, the flags set on MC/CPU domain, but is checked in their parents
>> balancing, like in NUMA domain.
>> Without the flag, will cause NUMA domain imbalance. like on my 2
>> sockets
>> NHM EP: 3 of 4 tasks were assigned on socket 0(lcpu, 10, 12, 14)
>>
>> In this case, update_sd_pick_busiest() need a reduced group_capacity
>> to
>> return true:
>>         if (sgs->sum_nr_running > sgs->group_capacity)
>>                 return true;
>> then numa domain balancing get chance to start.
> 
> Ah, indeed. Its always better to include such 'obvious' problems in the
> changelog :-)
> 

got it. :)
how about the following commit log and patch:

---

>From c97fceceaf9d68e73eaf015d5915474a9a94a2d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:53:00 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] sched: set SD_PREFER_SIBLING on MC domain to reduce a domain
 level

The domain flag SD_PREFER_SIBLING was set both on MC and CPU domain at
frist commit b5d978e0c7e79a, and was removed in-carefully when clear up
obsolete power scheduler. Then commit 6956dc568 recover the flag on CPU
domain only. It works, but it introduces a extra domain level since this
cause MC/CPU different.

So, recover the the flag in MC domain too to remove a domain level in
x86 platform.

This flag can not be removed since it is used to keep parent domain
balancing, like in NUMA domain, update_sd_pick_busiest() need a reduced
group_capacity to return 'true' then re-balance tasks from groups.

Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
---
 include/linux/topology.h |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
index d3cf0d6..386bcf4 100644
--- a/include/linux/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/topology.h
@@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
 				| 0*SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER			\
 				| 1*SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES		\
 				| 0*SD_SERIALIZE			\
+				| 1*SD_PREFER_SIBLING			\
 				,					\
 	.last_balance		= jiffies,				\
 	.balance_interval	= 1,					\
-- 
1.7.5.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/