linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cgroup: fix cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <511F3C6B.30604@huawei.com>
Date:	Sat, 16 Feb 2013 15:59:39 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
CC:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: fix cgroup_path() vs rename() race

(sorry for the late reply, just came back from holiday)

On 2013/2/9 2:46, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 01/25/2013 02:09 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
>> rename() will change dentry->d_name. The result of this race can
>> be worse than seeing partially rewritten name, but we might access
>> a stale pointer because rename() will re-allocate memory to hold
>> a longer name.
>>
>> Use dentry_path_raw(), and this vfs API will take care of lockings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
> 
> Hi Li,
> 
> I was fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest, and stumbled on
> a lockdep spew related to this patch.
> 
> Here's the spew (brace yourself):
> 

dentry_path_raw() will grab rename_lock and dentry->d_lock without disabling
irq, which means cgroup_path() can't be called if the caller has already held
a spinlock with irq disabled.

Both blkio cgroup and cpu cgroup have this lock issue...The only fix is to
make a copy of dentry->d_name and save it in cgrp->name.

Patch will be followed.

> [  313.262599] ======================================================
> [  313.271340] [ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ]
> [  313.277542] 3.8.0-rc6-next-20130208-sasha-00028-ge4e162d #278 Tainted: G        W
> [  313.277542] ------------------------------------------------------
> [  313.277542] kworker/u:3/4490 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
> [  313.277542]  (rename_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff812a11f9>] dentry_path_raw+0x29/0x70
> [  313.277542]
> [  313.277542] and this task is already holding:
> [  313.277542]  (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff819e78f3>] put_io_context_active+0x63/0x100
> [  313.277542] which would create a new lock dependency:
> [  313.277542]  (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-...} -> (rename_lock){+.+...}
> [  313.277542]
> [  313.277542] but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock:
> [  313.277542]  (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-...}
> ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at:
> 
...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/