[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130217225001.814892455@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:50:02 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Julien Cristau <jcristau@...ian.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: [ 01/66] drm/i915: Fix misplaced intel_mark_page_flip_active()
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
In commit 28c4566d30b8, backport of commit e7d841ca03b7 ('drm/i915:
Close race between processing unpin task and queueing the flip') I
somehow added two calls to intel_mark_page_flip_active() from
intel_gen4_queue_flip() and none from intel_gen6_queue_flip(). There
should of course be one from each.
Reported-by: Julien Cristau <jcristau@...ian.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -7156,8 +7156,6 @@ static int intel_gen4_queue_flip(struct
OUT_RING(pf | pipesrc);
intel_mark_page_flip_active(intel_crtc);
-
- intel_mark_page_flip_active(intel_crtc);
ADVANCE_LP_RING();
return 0;
@@ -7193,6 +7191,8 @@ static int intel_gen6_queue_flip(struct
pf = I915_READ(PF_CTL(intel_crtc->pipe)) & PF_ENABLE;
pipesrc = I915_READ(PIPESRC(intel_crtc->pipe)) & 0x0fff0fff;
OUT_RING(pf | pipesrc);
+
+ intel_mark_page_flip_active(intel_crtc);
ADVANCE_LP_RING();
return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists