[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1302181214250.22263@ionos>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:16:41 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tim Sander <tim.sander@....com>
cc: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: RCU?: Scheduling while atomic with 3.4.23-rt33
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Tim Sander wrote:
> Here is a transtribed backtrace for easier reading:
> c0010fac t dump_backtrace
> c022c188 T dump_stack
> c022c71c t __schedule_bug
> c022fb28 t __schedule
> c0230644 t rt_spin_lock_slowlock
> c0230ba8 T rt_spin_lock
> c003a9b8 T __wake_up
> c0052a44 t invoke_rcu_callbacks
> c0053764 T rcu_check_callbacks
> c0026060 T update_process_times
That's due to CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU=y. That's a known issue, which
has been fixed in 3.6-rt.
Steven, could you backport that to 3.2/3.4 please ?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists