linux-kernel - Re: Getting rid of freezer for suspend [was Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH] fuse: make fuse daemon frozen along with kernel threads]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:26:09 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	"Li, Fei" <fei.li@...el.com>
Cc:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@....de>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Wang, Biao" <biao.wang@...el.com>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Getting rid of freezer for suspend [was Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH] fuse: make fuse daemon frozen along with kernel threads]

On Monday, February 18, 2013 06:26:34 AM Li, Fei wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@...k.pl]
> > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 1:38 AM
> > To: Miklos Szeredi
> > Cc: Pavel Machek; Goswin von Brederlow; Li, Fei; Brown, Len;
> > mingo@...hat.com; peterz@...radead.org; Wang, Biao;
> > linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Liu, Chuansheng
> > Subject: Re: Getting rid of freezer for suspend [was Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH] fuse:
> > make fuse daemon frozen along with kernel threads]
> > 
> > On Thursday, February 14, 2013 02:09:50 PM Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, February 14, 2013 11:41:16 AM Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > >
> > > >>
> > > >> It is essentially the same mechanism that is used to delay the
> > > >> freezing of kernel threads after userspace tasks have been frozen.
> > > >> Except it's a lot more difficult to determine which userspace tasks
> > > >> need to be suspended late and which aren't.
> > > >
> > > > Well, I suppose that information is available to user space.
> > > >
> > > > Do we need an interface for a process to mark itself as PF_FREEZE_LATE or
> > > > do we need an interface for one process to mark another process as
> > > > PF_FREEZE_LATE, or both?
> > >
> > > As a first step marking self with PF_FREEZE_LATE and inheriting this
> > > flag across fork/clone would work for most cases, I think.
> > 
> > OK, so we can just have a switch for that in /proc I suppose.
> 
> Thanks for feedback and suggestion.
> 
> We have ever tried similar idea, expose interface /sys/power/pm_freeze_daemon,
> userspace tasks write 1 to this attribute to make itself to be frozen at the same time
> with kernel tasks, and it worked in our experiment.
> 
> Do you think it's suitable and enough to use such attribute /sys/power/pm_freeze_late, 
> or other more suitable place under /proc suggested?

I think it should be inder /proc, because that's where controls related to
process behavior are located.  E.g. /proc/PID/freeze_late or something like
that.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/