[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130218124052.26245.30164.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:10:52 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@...k.pl, sbw@....edu,
fweisbec@...il.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
walken@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 19/46] irq: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU
offline
Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to
depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from
going offline from under us.
Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline,
while invoking from atomic context.
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index e49a288..b4240b9 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/task_work.h>
#include "internals.h"
@@ -202,7 +203,9 @@ int irq_set_affinity(unsigned int irq, const struct cpumask *mask)
return -EINVAL;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
ret = __irq_set_affinity_locked(irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc), mask);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -343,7 +346,9 @@ int irq_select_affinity_usr(unsigned int irq, struct cpumask *mask)
int ret;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
ret = setup_affinity(irq, desc, mask);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -1126,7 +1131,9 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
}
/* Set default affinity mask once everything is setup */
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
setup_affinity(irq, desc, mask);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
} else if (new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK) {
unsigned int nmsk = new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists