[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130218124202.26245.9275.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:12:02 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@...k.pl, sbw@....edu,
fweisbec@...il.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
walken@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 27/46] perf/x86: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to
prevent CPU offline
The CPU_DYING notifier modifies the per-cpu pointer pmu->box, and this can
race with functions such as uncore_pmu_to_box() and uncore_pci_remove() when
we remove stop_machine() from the CPU offline path. So protect them using
get/put_online_cpus_atomic().
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
index b43200d..6faae53 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include "perf_event_intel_uncore.h"
static struct intel_uncore_type *empty_uncore[] = { NULL, };
@@ -1965,6 +1966,7 @@ uncore_pmu_to_box(struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu, int cpu)
if (box)
return box;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
raw_spin_lock(&uncore_box_lock);
list_for_each_entry(box, &pmu->box_list, list) {
if (box->phys_id == topology_physical_package_id(cpu)) {
@@ -1974,6 +1976,7 @@ uncore_pmu_to_box(struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu, int cpu)
}
}
raw_spin_unlock(&uncore_box_lock);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
return *per_cpu_ptr(pmu->box, cpu);
}
@@ -2556,6 +2559,7 @@ static void uncore_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(phys_id != box->phys_id))
return;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
raw_spin_lock(&uncore_box_lock);
list_del(&box->list);
raw_spin_unlock(&uncore_box_lock);
@@ -2569,6 +2573,7 @@ static void uncore_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&box->refcnt) != 1);
kfree(box);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
}
static int uncore_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists