[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130218124254.26245.4577.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:12:54 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@...k.pl, sbw@....edu,
fweisbec@...il.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
walken@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 33/46] cris/smp: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to
prevent CPU offline
Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to
depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from
going offline from under us.
Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline,
while invoking from atomic context.
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>
Cc: linux-cris-kernel@...s.com
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/smp.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/smp.c b/arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/smp.c
index 04a16ed..644b358 100644
--- a/arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/smp.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
@@ -208,9 +209,12 @@ int __cpuinit __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)
void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu)
{
cpumask_t cpu_mask;
+
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
cpumask_clear(&cpu_mask);
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_mask);
send_ipi(IPI_SCHEDULE, 0, cpu_mask);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
}
/* TLB flushing
@@ -224,6 +228,7 @@ void flush_tlb_common(struct mm_struct* mm, struct vm_area_struct* vma, unsigned
unsigned long flags;
cpumask_t cpu_mask;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
spin_lock_irqsave(&tlbstate_lock, flags);
cpu_mask = (mm == FLUSH_ALL ? cpu_all_mask : *mm_cpumask(mm));
cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &cpu_mask);
@@ -232,6 +237,7 @@ void flush_tlb_common(struct mm_struct* mm, struct vm_area_struct* vma, unsigned
flush_addr = addr;
send_ipi(IPI_FLUSH_TLB, 1, cpu_mask);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tlbstate_lock, flags);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
}
void flush_tlb_all(void)
@@ -312,6 +318,7 @@ int smp_call_function(void (*func)(void *info), void *info, int wait)
struct call_data_struct data;
int ret;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
cpumask_setall(&cpu_mask);
cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &cpu_mask);
@@ -325,6 +332,7 @@ int smp_call_function(void (*func)(void *info), void *info, int wait)
call_data = &data;
ret = send_ipi(IPI_CALL, wait, cpu_mask);
spin_unlock(&call_lock);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
return ret;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists