[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130218124127.26245.52045.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:11:27 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@...k.pl, sbw@....edu,
fweisbec@...il.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
walken@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 23/46] infiniband: ehca: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic()
to prevent CPU offline
Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to
depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from
going offline from under us.
Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline,
while invoking from atomic context.
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_irq.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_irq.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_irq.c
index 8615d7c..d61936c 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_irq.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/smpboot.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include "ehca_classes.h"
#include "ehca_irq.h"
@@ -653,6 +654,9 @@ void ehca_tasklet_eq(unsigned long data)
ehca_process_eq((struct ehca_shca*)data, 1);
}
+/*
+ * Must be called under get_online_cpus_atomic() and put_online_cpus_atomic().
+ */
static int find_next_online_cpu(struct ehca_comp_pool *pool)
{
int cpu;
@@ -703,6 +707,7 @@ static void queue_comp_task(struct ehca_cq *__cq)
int cq_jobs;
unsigned long flags;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
cpu_id = find_next_online_cpu(pool);
BUG_ON(!cpu_online(cpu_id));
@@ -720,6 +725,7 @@ static void queue_comp_task(struct ehca_cq *__cq)
BUG_ON(!cct || !thread);
}
__queue_comp_task(__cq, cct, thread);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
}
static void run_comp_task(struct ehca_cpu_comp_task *cct)
@@ -759,6 +765,7 @@ static void comp_task_park(unsigned int cpu)
list_splice_init(&cct->cq_list, &list);
spin_unlock_irq(&cct->task_lock);
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
cpu = find_next_online_cpu(pool);
target = per_cpu_ptr(pool->cpu_comp_tasks, cpu);
thread = *per_cpu_ptr(pool->cpu_comp_threads, cpu);
@@ -768,6 +775,7 @@ static void comp_task_park(unsigned int cpu)
__queue_comp_task(cq, target, thread);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&target->task_lock);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
}
static void comp_task_stop(unsigned int cpu, bool online)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists