linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: fix init NOHZ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:38:58 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: fix init NOHZ_IDLE flag

2013/2/18 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>:
> 2013/2/8 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>:
>> On 8 February 2013 16:35, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
>>> What if the following happen (inventing function names but you get the idea):
>>>
>>> CPU 0                                           CPU 1
>>>
>>> dom = new_domain(...) {
>>>            nr_cpus_busy = 0;
>>>            set_idle(CPU 1);                  old_dom =get_dom()
>>>                                                      clear_idle(CPU 1)
>>> }
>>> rcu_assign_pointer(cpu1_dom, dom);
>>>
>>>
>>> Can this scenario happen?
>>
>> This scenario will be:
>>
>>  CPU 0                                           CPU 1
>>
>>  detach_and_destroy_domain {
>>             rcu_assign_pointer(cpu1_dom, NULL);
>>  }
>>
>>  dom = new_domain(...) {
>>             nr_cpus_busy = 0;
>>             set_idle(CPU 1);                  old_dom =get_dom()
>>                                                       old_dom is null
>>                                                       //clear_idle(CPU
>> 1) can't happen because a null domain is attached so we will never
>> call nohz_kick_needed which is the only place where we can clear_idle
>>  }
>>  rcu_assign_pointer(cpu1_dom, dom);
>
> So is the following possible?
>
> = CPU 0 =                                                       = CPU 1=
>
> detach_and_destroy_domain {
>             rcu_assign_pointer(cpu1_dom, NULL);
> }
>
> dom = new_domain(...) {
>              nr_cpus_busy = 0;
>              set_idle(CPU 1);
> }
>
> clear_idle(CPU 1)
>
> dom = rcu_dereference(cpu1_dom)
>
> //dom == NULL, return
>
> rcu_assign_pointer(cpu1_dom, NULL);
>
>
> set_idle(CPU 1)
>
> dom = rcu_dereference(cpu1_dom)
>
> //dec nr_cpus_busy, making it negative

Sorry, gmail messed up as usual.

I pasted the original at: http://pastebin.com/DMm5U8J8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/