[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hxxWBfi5Ad+X27ouFDFBM-LttRJiEn3f83T1Q2z=v1k7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:40:40 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: fix init NOHZ_IDLE flag
2013/2/18 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>:
> On 18 February 2013 15:38, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
>> I pasted the original at: http://pastebin.com/DMm5U8J8
>
> We can clear the idle flag only in the nohz_kick_needed which will not
> be called if the sched_domain is NULL so the sequence will be
>
> = CPU 0 = = CPU 1=
>
> detach_and_destroy_domain {
> rcu_assign_pointer(cpu1_dom, NULL);
> }
>
> dom = new_domain(...) {
> nr_cpus_busy = 0;
> set_idle(CPU 1);
> }
> dom =
> rcu_dereference(cpu1_dom)
> //dom == NULL, return
>
> rcu_assign_pointer(cpu1_dom, dom);
>
> dom =
> rcu_dereference(cpu1_dom)
> //dom != NULL,
> nohz_kick_needed {
>
> set_idle(CPU 1)
> dom
> = rcu_dereference(cpu1_dom)
>
> //dec nr_cpus_busy,
> }
>
> Vincent
Ok but CPU 0 can assign NULL to the domain of cpu1 while CPU 1 is
already in the middle of nohz_kick_needed().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists