linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1398469748.2079082.1361207251021.JavaMail.root@vmware.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:07:31 -0800 (PST)
From:	Andy King <acking@...are.com>
To:	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	pv-drivers@...are.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets

Hi Gerd,

> > +		written = transport->stream_enqueue(
> > +				vsk, msg->msg_iov,
> > +				len - total_written);
> 
> Hmm, shouldn't we pass total_written to stream_enqueue here?
> 
> In case a blocking send(big-buffer) call gets splitted into multiple
> stream_enqueue calls the second (and further) stream_enqueue calls need
> to know at which msg offset they should continue sending the data, no?

On the client side, the iov tracks it internally; see memcpy_fromiovec().
On the socket side, VMCI uses a ring buffer, so it also knows its
position internally.  Or did I misunderstand the question?

Thanks!
- Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/