linux-kernel - Re: SYSFS "errors"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:40:32 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SYSFS "errors"

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 08:47:35PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:45:27PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:27:00PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > No such device - /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/sdram_scrub_rate
> > 
> > Looks like your edac module doesn't allow scrub rate setting. Which edac
> > driver is that? dmesg?
> 
> $ lsmod | grep -i edac
> i7core_edac            22414  0 
> edac_core              43453  2 i7core_edac

Ok, that would be those i7s which reportedly do
not support reading/setting the scrub rate, see
27100db0e0d381d24b6f3cb1a4f439996e7c00c8, for example.

So this is as expected.

Maybe it would be more correct if the core would return "N/A" or
"unsupported" or something to that effect in such cases, to conform with
the readable flag of the sysfs file.

Hmm.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/