lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130218200424.GA20137@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:04:24 +0200
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SYSFS "errors"

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 08:40:32PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 08:47:35PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:45:27PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:27:00PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > No such device - /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/sdram_scrub_rate
> > > 
> > > Looks like your edac module doesn't allow scrub rate setting. Which edac
> > > driver is that? dmesg?
> > 
> > $ lsmod | grep -i edac
> > i7core_edac            22414  0 
> > edac_core              43453  2 i7core_edac
> 
> Ok, that would be those i7s which reportedly do
> not support reading/setting the scrub rate, see
> 27100db0e0d381d24b6f3cb1a4f439996e7c00c8, for example.
> 
> So this is as expected.
> 
> Maybe it would be more correct if the core would return "N/A" or
> "unsupported" or something to that effect in such cases, to conform with
> the readable flag of the sysfs file.

yeah, that would be cool :-)

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ