[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1302181655110.6790-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:55:35 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
Shane Huang <shane.huang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] sd: change to auto suspend mode
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> Placing a WARN_ON there seems to suggest drivers should not return
> -EAGAIN, so I think I'll just add back those dropped code to
> sdev_runtime_suspend as you have suggested like this:
>
> static int sdev_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
> int (*cb)(struct device *) = pm ? pm->runtime_suspend : NULL;
> struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
> int ret;
>
> if (sdev->request_queue->dev)
> return sdev_blk_runtime_suspend(sdev, cb);
>
> ret = scsi_dev_type_suspend(dev, cb);
> if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> pm_schedule_suspend(dev, jiffies_to_msecs(
> round_jiffies_up_relative(HZ/10)));
> return ret;
> }
>
> Does this look OK?
Yes.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists