[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1361248883.23152.199.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:41:23 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner (tglx@...utronix.de)" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"'mingo@...e.hu' (mingo@...e.hu)" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Borislav Petkov (bp@...en8.de)" <bp@...en8.de>,
Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>,
"dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"Luck, Tony (tony.luck@...el.com)" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] trace,x86: add x86 irq vector tracepoints
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 20:39 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > static void switch_to_trace_idt(void *arg)
> > {
> > load_idt(&trace_idt_descr);
> > }
> >
> > static void restore_original_idt(void *arg)
> > {
> > load_idt(this_cpu_ptr(&idt_descr));
> > }
> >
>
> Yes. If there needs to be handshaking about whose IDT is currently
> installed I'm much happier if that handshake is done explicitly, rather
> than as a save/restore function which will break when we have to add
> another one which for whatever reason isn't nesting.
Agreed.
Seiji, can you make the update?
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists