[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130219053148.GC3108@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:31:51 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dt: add header to define tegra20 clocks
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:54:28AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/13/2013 11:38 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > To replace magic number in "clocks = <&tegra_car 28>;"
>
> I like the concept here; I was thinking about doing this today, but you
> beat me to it:-) Feel free to create the Tegra30 header too, and modify
> all the *.dts* files.
>
> To address other comments in this thread: Yes, I think that we will want
> to modify the clock driver to include this header to avoid
> duplication/errors (that will require adjusting Linux's include path),
> and also remove the list of IDs from the binding document; it can just
> refer the the new header by name and cause the header to *be* part of
> the binding document.
I like it, since doing so will help us hijack kernel to have dts stay
in the tree rather than going to a separate repository :)
Seriously, is maintaining dts in a separate repository still a plan?
If yes, we will have duplication problem someday anyway.
For reason of it, I vote for having dts stay in the kernel tree.
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists