[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1361237185.23152.174.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:26:25 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched: BUG in load_balance
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 19:55 -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest, running today's -next,
> I've stumbled on the following spew.
>
> I've cc'ed Steven Rostedt since the culprit looks like "sched: Enable
> interrupts in idle_balance()".
You're correct. Interrupts are ok but softirqs must still be disabled.
The following patch should work.
-- Steve
Only compiled tested:
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 0fcdbff..a31174c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5222,9 +5222,9 @@ void idle_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
update_rq_runnable_avg(this_rq, 1);
/*
- * Drop the rq->lock, but keep preempt disabled.
+ * Drop the rq->lock, but keep softirqs disabled.
*/
- preempt_disable();
+ local_bh_disable();
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&this_rq->lock);
update_blocked_averages(this_cpu);
@@ -5253,7 +5253,7 @@ void idle_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
rcu_read_unlock();
raw_spin_lock_irq(&this_rq->lock);
- preempt_enable();
+ local_bh_enable();
if (pulled_task || time_after(jiffies, this_rq->next_balance)) {
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists