[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130219013154.GH26694@dastard>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:31:54 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Ben Myers <bpm@....com>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH review 08/16] xfs: Use kprojids when allocating inodes.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:11:01PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>
> In xfs_create and xfs_symlink compute the desired kprojid and pass it
> down into xfs_ialloc.
NACK.
The first time you posted this code I NACKed it because:
>> This sort of thing just makes me cringe. This is all internal
>> project ID management that has nothing to do with namespaces.
>> It's for project ID's that are inherited from the parent inode,
>> and as such we do not care one bit what the namespace is.
>> Internal passing of project IDs like this this should not be
>> converted at all as it has nothing at all to do with the
>> namespaces.
Please drop this patch or replace it with a simple patch that passes
the project ID as an xfs_dqid_t (i.e. a flat, 32 bit quota
identifier) instead so you can kill the prid_t type.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists