[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hw_rs7WLx_yav6aAE-AhS1bLvbup4k7UfPAs3j+sjBYvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:08:10 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Debugging Thinkpad T430s occasional suspend failure.
2013/2/18 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here is an updated version. It cleans up things a bit and boots fine with my usual
>> config. There might be still some small details to work on but here is the big picture.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> Looks fine to me. Did this get tested with lockdep and spinlock
> debugging etc? Those are the ones that are the primary users of all
> the irq state and preempt tracing..
Yeah I always keep those options turned on to test my patches. But I
need to test with and without preempt, check if I can reuse more
local_bh_disable, etc... So there will be more iterations.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists