| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130219123344.GA18350@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:33:44 +0800
From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, andi@...stfloor.org,
Wuqixuan <wuqixuan@...wei.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] vfs: always protect diretory file->fpos with inode
mutex
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:22:40AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> There's a long long-standing bug...As long as I don't know when it dates
> from.
>
> I've written and attached a simple program to reproduce this bug, and it can
> immediately trigger the bug in my box. It uses two threads, one keeps calling
> read(), and the other calling readdir(), both on the same directory fd.
Hi Zefan,
Out of curiosity, why do you call read(2) on a directory fd? I only
open(2) a directory in order to execute a flush operation to make sure
that a file is really created.
Regards,
- Zheng
>
> When I ran it on ext3 (can be replaced with ext2/ext4) which has _dir_index_
> feature disabled, I got this:
>
> EXT3-fs error (device loop1): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #34817: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=993, inode=0, rec_len=0, name_len=0
> EXT3-fs error (device loop1): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #34817: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=1009, inode=0, rec_len=0, name_len=0
> EXT3-fs error (device loop1): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #34817: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=993, inode=0, rec_len=0, name_len=0
> EXT3-fs error (device loop1): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #34817: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=1009, inode=0, rec_len=0, name_len=0
> ...
>
> If we configured errors=remount-ro, the filesystem will become read-only.
>
> SYSCALL_DEFINE3(read, unsigned int, fd, char __user *, buf, size_t, count)
> {
> ...
> loff_t pos = file_pos_read(file);
> ret = vfs_read(file, buf, count, &pos);
> file_pos_write(file, pos);
> fput_light(file, fput_needed);
> ...
> }
>
> While readdir() is protected with i_mutex, f_pos can be changed without any locking
> in various read()/write() syscalls, which leads to this bug.
>
> What makes things worse is Andi removed i_mutex from generic_file_llseek, so you
> can trigger the same bug by replacing read() with lseek() in the test program.
>
> commit ef3d0fd27e90f67e35da516dafc1482c82939a60
> Author: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Thu Sep 15 16:06:48 2011 -0700
>
> vfs: do (nearly) lockless generic_file_llseek
>
> I've tested ext3 with dir_index enabled and btrfs, nothing bad happened, but there
> should be some other vulnerabilities. For example, running the test program on /sys
> for a few minutes triggered this warning:
>
> [ 917.994600] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 917.994614] WARNING: at fs/sysfs/sysfs.h:195 sysfs_readdir+0x24c/0x260()
> [ 917.994621] Hardware name: Tecal RH2285
> ...
> [ 917.994725] Pid: 8754, comm: a.out Not tainted 3.8.0-rc2-tj-0.7-default+ #69
> [ 917.994731] Call Trace:
> [ 917.994736] [<ffffffff81205c6c>] ? sysfs_readdir+0x24c/0x260
> [ 917.994743] [<ffffffff81205c6c>] ? sysfs_readdir+0x24c/0x260
> [ 917.994752] [<ffffffff81041fff>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
> [ 917.994759] [<ffffffff8104205a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> [ 917.994766] [<ffffffff81205c6c>] sysfs_readdir+0x24c/0x260
> [ 917.994774] [<ffffffff8119cbd0>] ? sys_ioctl+0x90/0x90
> [ 917.994780] [<ffffffff8119cbd0>] ? sys_ioctl+0x90/0x90
> [ 917.994787] [<ffffffff8119cfc1>] vfs_readdir+0xb1/0xd0
> [ 917.994794] [<ffffffff8119d07b>] sys_getdents64+0x9b/0x110
> [ 917.994803] [<ffffffff814a45d9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 917.994809] ---[ end trace 6efe15a65b89022a ]---
> [ 917.994816] ida_remove called for id=13073 which is not allocated.
>
>
> We can fix this bug in each filesystem, but can't we just make sure i_mutex is
> acquired in lseek(), read(), write() and readdir() for directory file operations?
>
> (the patch is for demonstration only)
>
> diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> index bb34af3..41f76e5 100644
> --- a/fs/read_write.c
> +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> @@ -218,14 +218,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(default_llseek);
>
> loff_t vfs_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
> {
> + struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
> loff_t (*fn)(struct file *, loff_t, int);
> + int ret;
>
> fn = no_llseek;
> if (file->f_mode & FMODE_LSEEK) {
> if (file->f_op && file->f_op->llseek)
> fn = file->f_op->llseek;
> }
> - return fn(file, offset, whence);
> +
> + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
> + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> + ret = fn(file, offset, whence);
> + mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> + } else {
> + ret = fn(file, offset, whence);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfs_llseek);
>
> @@ -442,12 +453,32 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfs_write);
>
> static inline loff_t file_pos_read(struct file *file)
> {
> - return file->f_pos;
> + struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
> + loff_t pos;
> +
> + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
> + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> + pos = file->f_pos;
> + mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> + } else {
> + pos = file->f_pos;
> + }
> +
> + return pos;
> }
>
> static inline void file_pos_write(struct file *file, loff_t pos)
> {
> - file->f_pos = pos;
> + struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
> +
> + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
> + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> + file->f_pos = pos;
> + file->f_version = 0;
> + mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> + } else {
> + file->f_pos = pos;
> + }
> }
>
> SYSCALL_DEFINE3(read, unsigned int, fd, char __user *, buf, size_t, count)
>
>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <dirent.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <sys/stat.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> int fd;
> int ret;
> DIR *dir;
> struct dirent *ptr;
>
> if (argc != 2)
> errx(1, "Please specify a directory");
>
> dir = opendir(argv[1]);
> if (!dir)
> err(1, "Failed to open directory %s", argv[1]);
>
> fd = dirfd(dir);
> if (fd < 0)
> err(1, "Failed to get dirfd");
>
> ret = fork();
> if (ret == 0) {
> char buf[100];
>
> while (1)
> read(fd, buf, 100);
> } else {
> int ret2;
>
> while (1) {
> ret2 = lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
> if (ret2 < -1)
> err(1, "seek failed");
>
> while (ptr = readdir(dir))
> ;
> }
> }
>
> closedir(dir);
> return 0;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists