linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] Tegra114 clockframework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:50:34 -0800
From:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
Cc:	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>, Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] Tegra114 clockframework

Quoting Stephen Warren (2013-02-19 10:39:35)
> On 02/15/2013 05:36 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > This is the seventh version of the Tegra114 clockframework. It is based on the
> > for-next branch of
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/swarren/linux-tegra.git and
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220452.html.
> 
> Mike,
> 
> I think it'd be prudent to take this series through the Tegra tree again
> for 3.10; patch 11 needs to go in as part of the series due to internal
> dependencies, and I'm slightly worried that other Tegra DT changes might
> conflict with that patch (if only for context). Taking this series (and
> any other Tegra clk driver changes for 3.10) through the Tegra tree
> could resolve that easily. Do you have a problem with that?
> 

I was thinking the same thing.  I'll make time to review these now that
3.8 is out.

> If that's OK, can you stage the dependency Peter mentioned:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220452.html
> into a stable branch for me to merge, obviously after 3.9-rc1 is out.
> 

I'll take another look at that one.  I haven't merged it yet for some
reason but I've forgotten why.  Assuming nothing is wrong then I'll pull
it in towards 3.10.

Regards,
Mike

> Thanks.
> 
> Prashant, could you provide a review/ack for this series too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/