linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 13/15] workqueue: also record worker in work->data if running&&queued

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130219202447.GY17414@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:24:47 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>
Cc:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 13/15] workqueue: also record worker in work->data if
 running&&queued

Hey, again.

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:27:50AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 0001 is problematic because it adds a hash lookup which isn't
> necessary.  In this series, it's okay as the later lookup is removed
> eventually but without that, I don't think it's a good idea to apply
> 0001.
> 
> 0002 looks good to me.
> 
> 0005, I'm not sure what the benefit would be without later changes.
> 
> 0006-0008 yeah, probably.
> 
> I'll try to apply them on top of wq/for-3.9.

So, I picked and applied 2, 6-8 on a temp branch.  FYI, note that I'm
currently sitting on top of a bunch of patches implementing custom
worker_pools and likely to prioritize them over other conflicting
changes.  I'm expecting to send these out in a week or so.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/