linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/35] mfd: ab8500-core: Rework MFD sub-device initialisation structures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201302192207.31465.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:07:31 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sameo@...ux.intel.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/35] mfd: ab8500-core: Rework MFD sub-device initialisation structures

On Friday 15 February 2013, Lee Jones wrote:
> +       {
> +               .name = "ab8500-charger",
> +               .of_compatible = "stericsson,ab8500-charger",
> +               .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(ab8500_charger_resources),
> +               .resources = ab8500_charger_resources,
> +#ifndef CONFIG_OF
> +               .platform_data = &ab8500_bm_data,
> +               .pdata_size = sizeof(ab8500_bm_data),
> +#endif
> +       },

Is this #ifdef correct? I would have expected "#ifdef CONFIG_ATAGS" here.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/