lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHFNz9+RnXh3AeSn70mpP-Z=26=MCZDtGPHnr67U++i7X6ELOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:28:09 +0530
From:	Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@...il.com>
To:	Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
Cc:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
	Manu Abraham <manu@...uxtv.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ldv-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] stv090x: do not unlock unheld mutex in stv090x_sleep()

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Alexey Khoroshilov
<khoroshilov@...ras.ru> wrote:
> goto err and goto err_gateoff before mutex_lock(&state->internal->demod_lock)
> lead to unlock of unheld mutex in stv090x_sleep().

Out of curiosity, what happens when you try to unlock an unlocked mutex ?

Regards,
Manu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ