[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1361343926.7859.53.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:05:26 +0800
From: li guang <lig.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] acpi: move x86/mm/srat.c to
x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c
在 2013-02-19二的 23:00 -0800,David Rientjes写道:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, li guang wrote:
>
> > Yes, I know there's no new changes in my patch as I said before(not
> > based on lasted), but as I try to apply my patch(1/4), it will do
> > the right work to move current srat.c from arch/x86/mm/ to
> > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/ regardless of what I based is not latest.
> >
>
> Sorry, but that makes no sense. Your patch cannot be used cleanly if
> there have been subsequent changes to a hunk prior to applying it -- in
> this case the hunk would be the entire file since you're removing it.
>
> These patches would also be pushed by the x86 maintainers, who are not
> cc'd on this patch, and I think it would be unfair to ask them to make up
> for your inability to generate a bleeding edge patch with linux-next. The
> changes already cited in this thread have been in linux-next for almost
> two weeks, yet you refuse to rebase on top of them.
OK, I'd like to rebase,
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists