[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <000801ce0f41$00e79170$02b6b450$%han@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:05:10 +0900
From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
To: 'Dmitry Torokhov' <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: 'Samuel Ortiz' <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 'Jingoo Han' <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 07/11] mfd: menelaus: use devm_request_irq() and
devm_kzalloc()
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:31 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> Hi Jongoo,
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:12:38PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > Use devm_request_irq() and devm_kzalloc() to make cleanup paths
> > more simple.
> >
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -1269,9 +1266,7 @@ static int __exit menelaus_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > {
> > struct menelaus_chip *menelaus = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> >
> > - free_irq(client->irq, menelaus);
> > flush_work(&menelaus->work);
> > - kfree(menelaus);
> > the_menelaus = NULL;
> > return 0;
>
> This conversion is certainly wrong - you really want to disable IRQ and
> then wait for the scheduled work to finish before freeing memory. Here
> you flush work but nothing stops IRQ from firing and scheduling that
> work again.
Yes, you're right.
I will use devm_free_irq() before flush_work().
>
> Please, be *extra* careful with devm_request_irq() conversions.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists