[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1361352229.1051.144.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:23:49 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "JBeulich@...e.com" <JBeulich@...e.com>,
"drjones@...hat.com" <drjones@...hat.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: netback: remove redundant xenvif_put
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 18:06 +0000, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:58:44 +0000
>
> > On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 08:03 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 19.02.13 at 06:53, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> >> > From: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
> >> > Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:29:20 +0100
> >> >
> >> >> netbk_fatal_tx_err() calls xenvif_carrier_off(), which does
> >> >> a xenvif_put(). As callers of netbk_fatal_tx_err should only
> >> >> have one reference to the vif at this time, then the xenvif_put
> >> >> in netbk_fatal_tx_err is one too many.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
> >> >
> >> > Applied.
> >>
> >> But this is wrong from all we can tell,
> >
> > Yes, please can this be reverted.
>
> Done and I've annotated the revert commit message with as much
> information as possible.
Thanks, 629821d9b looks good to me.
May be worth considering the patch in
<1361281636.1051.100.camel@...az.uk.xensource.com> if we get many more
of these queries...
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists