[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1361353360.10155.9.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:42:40 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, pjt@...gle.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, efault@....de, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
morten.rasmussen@....com
Subject: Re: [patch v5 09/15] sched: add power aware scheduling in
fork/exec/wake
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 13:07 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> +/*
> + * Try to collect the task running number and capacity of the group.
> + */
> +static void get_sg_power_stats(struct sched_group *group,
> + struct sched_domain *sd, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(group)) {
> + struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
> +
> + sgs->group_utils += rq->nr_running;
> + }
> +
> + sgs->group_capacity = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(group->sgp->power,
> + SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
> + if (!sgs->group_capacity)
> + sgs->group_capacity = fix_small_capacity(sd, group);
> + sgs->group_weight = group->group_weight;
> +}
So you're trying to compute the group utilization, but what does that
have to do with nr_running? In an earlier patch you introduced the
per-cpu utilization, so why not avg that to compute the group
utilization?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists