linux-kernel - Re: general protection fault in do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130220100354.GL3600@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:03:54 +0200
From:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To:	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
Cc:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: general protection fault in do_msgrcv  [3.8]

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23:22PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> 19.02.2013 22:04, Dave Jones пишет:
> >general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> >Modules linked in: can af_rxrpc binfmt_misc scsi_transport_iscsi ax25 ipt_ULOG decnet nfc appletalk x25 rds ipx p8023 psnap p8022 llc irda crc_ccitt atm lockd sunrpc ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_conntrack nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables btusb bluetooth snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_pcm edac_core snd_page_alloc snd_timer microcode rfkill usb_debug serio_raw pcspkr snd soundcore vhost_net r8169 mii tun macvtap macvlan kvm_amd kvm
> >CPU 2
> >Pid: 887, comm: trinity-child2 Not tainted 3.8.0+ #57 Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-MA78GM-S2H/GA-MA78GM-S2H
> >RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff812aebba>]  [<ffffffff812aebba>] do_msgrcv+0x22a/0x670
> >RSP: 0018:ffff88011892be88  EFLAGS: 00010297
> >RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000004000
> >RDX: 000000007adea6f6 RSI: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RDI: ffff8801189ffb60
> >RBP: ffff88011892bf68 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
> >R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
> >R13: ffff8801189ffc10 R14: ffff8801189ffb60 R15: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b
> >FS:  00007f681e955740(0000) GS:ffff88012f200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> >CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> >CR2: 00007f681e846064 CR3: 000000012553d000 CR4: 00000000000007e0
> >DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> >DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> >Process trinity-child2 (pid: 887, threadinfo ffff88011892a000, task ffff88010bc82490)
> >Stack:
> >  ffff88011892beb8 ffff88010bc82490 ffff88010bc82490 ffff88010bc82490
> >  ffff8801186d8000 ffffffff812ad5f0 0000000001aba000 ffffffff81c688c0
> >  000000007adea6f6 00000000001fffff 0000400046a9467e 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b
> >Call Trace:
> >  [<ffffffff812ad5f0>] ? load_msg+0x180/0x180
> >  [<ffffffff810b8395>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x115/0x1a0
> >  [<ffffffff813347be>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
> >  [<ffffffff812af015>] sys_msgrcv+0x15/0x20
> >  [<ffffffff816a8482>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> >Code: 84 14 01 00 00 8b 8d 74 ff ff ff 85 c9 0f 84 52 02 00 00 48 8b 95 60 ff ff ff 48 39 55 80 0f 84 4d 02 00 00 4c 89 bd 78 ff ff ff <4d> 8b 3f 48 ff 45 80 4d 39 ef 75 9a 66 90 48 81 bd 78 ff ff ff
> >RIP  [<ffffffff812aebba>] do_msgrcv+0x22a/0x670
> >  RSP <ffff88011892be88>
> >---[ end trace d3cc044a84b1d828 ]---
> >
> >oopsing instruction is..
> >
> >    0:	4d 8b 3f             	mov    (%r15),%r15
> >
> >Looks like a use-after-free.
> >
> >Disassembly of ipc/msg.o shows this happens here..
> >
> >                 msg = ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
> >                 tmp = msq->q_messages.next;
> >     1537:       4d 8b be b0 00 00 00    mov    0xb0(%r14),%r15
> >                 while (tmp != &msq->q_messages) {
> >     153e:       4d 8d ae b0 00 00 00    lea    0xb0(%r14),%r13
> >     1545:       4d 39 ef                cmp    %r13,%r15
> >     1548:       0f 84 5f 03 00 00       je     18ad <do_msgrcv+0x50d>
> >     154e:       48 c7 45 80 00 00 00    movq   $0x0,-0x80(%rbp)
> >     1555:       00
> >     1556:       48 c7 85 78 ff ff ff    movq   $0xfffffffffffffff5,-0x88(%rbp)
> >     155d:       f5 ff ff ff
> >     1561:       eb 0d                   jmp    1570 <do_msgrcv+0x1d0>
> >     1563:       0f 1f 44 00 00          nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
> >                                         }
> >                                 } else
> >                                         break;
> >                                 msg_counter++;
> >                         }
> >                         tmp = tmp->next;
> >     1568:       4d 8b 3f                mov    (%r15),%r15
> >                 if (ipcperms(ns, &msq->q_perm, S_IRUGO))
> >                         goto out_unlock;
> >
> >                 msg = ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
> >                 tmp = msq->q_messages.next;
> >                 while (tmp != &msq->q_messages) {
> >
> >Looks like Stanislav recently changed this code, so problem was likely introduced
> >in those changes.
> >
> 
> Hello.
> Is it easy to reproduce? Do you use KVM?
Jugging by motherboard name in the OOPs it is not KVM. And since r15 is
6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b you need DEBUG_PAGEALLOC to reproduce.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/