linux-kernel - [PATCH] perf, x86: add Intel IvyBridge event scheduling constraints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1361355312-3323-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:15:12 +0100
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, ak@...ux.intel.com,
	acme@...hat.com, jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung.kim@....com
Subject: [PATCH] perf, x86: add Intel IvyBridge event scheduling constraints

Intel IvyBridge processor has different constraints compared
to SandyBridge. Therefore it needs its own contraint table.
This patch adds the constraint table. Without this patch,
the events listed in the patch may not be scheduled correctly
and bogus counts may be collected.

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 4914e94..529c893 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -107,6 +107,27 @@ static struct event_constraint intel_snb_event_constraints[] __read_mostly =
 	EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
 };
 
+static struct event_constraint intel_ivb_event_constraints[] __read_mostly =
+{
+	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c0, 0), /* INST_RETIRED.ANY */
+	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x003c, 1), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE */
+	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
+	INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0148, 0x4), /* L1D_PEND_MISS.PENDING */
+	INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0279, 0xf), /* IDQ.EMTPY */
+	INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x019c, 0xf), /* IDQ_UOPS_NOT_DELIVERED.CORE */
+	INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x04a3, 0xf), /* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_NO_EXECUTE */
+	INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x05a3, 0xf), /* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING */
+	INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x06a3, 0xf), /* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_LDM_PENDING */
+	INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x08a3, 0x4), /* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_L1D_PENDING */
+	INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0ca3, 0x4), /* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L1D_PENDING */
+	INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x01c0, 0x2), /* INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST */
+	INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xd0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.* */
+	INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xd1, 0xf), /* MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.* */
+	INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xd2, 0xf), /* MEM_LOAD_UOPS_LLC_HIT_RETIRED.* */
+	INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xd3, 0xf), /*  MEM_LOAD_UOPS_LLC_MISS_RETIRED.* */
+	EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
+};
+
 static struct extra_reg intel_westmere_extra_regs[] __read_mostly =
 {
 	INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xb7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0xffff, RSP_0),
@@ -2095,7 +2116,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 
 		intel_pmu_lbr_init_snb();
 
-		x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_snb_event_constraints;
+		x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_ivb_event_constraints;
 		x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_ivb_pebs_event_constraints;
 		x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_snb;
 		x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snb_extra_regs;
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/