[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130220103719.GA7691@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:37:19 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lockdep: check that no locks held at freeze time
* Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org> wrote:
> We shouldn't try_to_freeze if locks are held. Verified that
> I get no lockdep warnings after applying this patch and
> "vfork: don't freezer_count() for in-kernel users of CLONE_VFORK".
>
> Changes since v1:
> * LKML: <20130215111635.GA26955@...il.com> Ingo Molnar
> * Added a msg string that gets passed in.
> * LKML: <20130215154449.GD30829@...hat.com> Oleg Nesterov
> * Check PF_NOFREEZE in try_to_freeze().
> Changes since v2:
> * LKML: <20130216170605.GC4910@...hat.com> Oleg Nesterov
> * Avoid unnecessary PF_NOFREEZE check when !CONFIG_LOCKDEP.
> * Mandeep Singh Baines
> * Generalize an exit specific printk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>
> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Looks good to me now.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Which tree should this go through?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists