[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130220104043.GB7691@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:40:43 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, anton@...ba.org, hpa@...or.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] rwsem: Implement writer lock-stealing
* Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com> wrote:
> > Alex, could you go through my patch and see if there is
> > anything you find objectionable ? (if not about the details,
> > at least about the general approach of enabling writer lock
> > stealing on the fast path)
>
> I did a quick review on the patchset and tested the patches
> 1~3, and 1~3 plus 4th, my patch plus 4th.
>
> The patch looks much complicated, and also goes writing slow
> path to steal locking. My patch looks quite straight and
> simple.
>
> This 1~3 patch has very very similar performance effect with
> mine.
>
> The highlight patch is the 4th, seems it can provide about ~2%
> aim7 performance gain(base on both of mine or patches 1~3) on
> my 4S NHM EX machine.
That speedup would be nice to have.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists