[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130220112709.cc28b5b07afd6475157bb6ad@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:27:09 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL UPDATED] workqueue core changes for 3.9-rc1
Hi Tejun,
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:19:25 -0800 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:14:13AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:11:25 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is very different from what has been in linux-next (it looks like
> > > you have been cherry-picking fixes from other sources into your for-next
> > > branch?):
> >
> > Or maybe what is in linux-next is a mash up of several different things?
>
> Ooh, wq/for-next was combination of wq/for-3.9, wq/for-3.9-cleanups
> and wq/for-3.9-async. I'm fairly sure all the commits are accounted
> for. Checking again just in case....
>
> $ git rev-list --pretty --oneline tmp ^next-20130219
> bd26f12 Merge branch 'for-3.9-async' into tmp
> 0f985c9 Merge branch 'for-3.9-cleanups' into tmp
> 1438ade5 workqueue: un-GPL function delayed_work_timer_fn()
>
> tmp is for-3.9 + for-3.9-async + for-3.9-cleanups, so yeah other than
> the last cherry-pick, everything seems to be in order.
Thanks for checking - sorry for the noise.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists